I find it interesting that no one has noted the difference between the 50 yard approach if you successfully take on the quirky blind second shot vs. the 134 yard approach if you try to traverse the quirky canyon.
Enough quirk for you there Dai?
In general, my feeling is that outcome is around the right balance, in that the blind shot is still the more risky, hence it should leave you with the shorter shot if successfully executed. The three fronting bunkers - although one has been erroneously filled in - are placed for the shot coming over the saddle whilst providing an aesthetic for the shot coming in from the valley.
In an ideal world, the fairway of the safer, valley route would be 10 yards wider.
What is interesting about the hole is that it is a genuine three-shotter regardless. No one is going for that green in two.