This discussion group is best enjoyed using Google Chrome, Firefox or Safari.
I'd suggest that folks write to other discussion group owners and ask how/why they do or don't store images on site.
Quote from: Ronald Montesano on February 13, 2022, 03:12:08 PMEven though internet software strips down photos to be viewable but not super-printable, they still take up space. I can promise that Ran's server bills would go through the roof if images were stored and not linked. Just not feasible for a site that relies on voluntary donations.Ron,I'm not sure where you're getting your information from, but storage space is cheaper than ever...and a ton of it. Just a couple of annual donations on this site, could completely cover...and then some...an absurd amount of jpegs which don't take up much space relative to other formats like video. Its stupid simple to do, in addition to being super cheap. And the functionality already exists in this forum software, just needs to be configured and turned on.Now if Ran doesn't want to do it for whatever reason, so be it, its his site...but cost is certainly not the deterrent.
Even though internet software strips down photos to be viewable but not super-printable, they still take up space. I can promise that Ran's server bills would go through the roof if images were stored and not linked. Just not feasible for a site that relies on voluntary donations.