Golf Club Atlas
GolfClubAtlas.com => Golf Course Architecture => Topic started by: Brad Steven on February 15, 2022, 11:11:54 AM
-
Looking to take a group to Forest Dunes for a couple days and hoping to get some insight into the golf experience there. I've heard the original FD described as having a mix of the pristine and the rustic (PV-like). Generally, I'm a fan of Weiskopf designs and if FD is in fact at the top of his list, I think I'll like it. The Loop is a common discussion item here I know and while I'm certain it will make for a great 18 hole experience, I'm intrigued at just how different the loops will play. Not all of my guys are architecture enthusiasts but they know really good golf when they see it. Would appreciate any comments.
-
Forest Dunes and the Loop are both excellent. I think that they're both easily among Michigan's top 5 public courses--and that's become a really good list. The only other Weiskopf course that I've played is the Cedar River Village course at Shanty Creek and Forest Dunes is far superior. It has several excellent short par 4s (6, 13, 17), a few excellent par 5s (5, 15), and a lovely setting. The name should be taken literally--there's forest and there are dunes.
Another huge plus of the Forest Dunes complex is that I've never seen two courses on the same site that are so completely different. Forest Dunes is pristine, the Loop is very rustic. The Loop gets so much attention because its a reversible but for me, the most notable thing about the Loop is that it's the only course that I've played in the US that truly plays like a links course. Drop your putter from knee-height in one of the fairways and you'll hear what I mean. The course design is also conducive to links-style golf, with short grass everywhere. Some complain about the greens being too small and severe and I agree with that in spots but overall, it's a very interesting and original course.
The accommodations are now also fantastic. So is the new par 3 course. All-in-all, it's a great golf resort and I can't wait for them to add the third course.
-
Some complain about the greens being too small and severe and I agree with that in spots but overall, it's a very interesting and original course.
The greens are on average 6000 square feet, so "too small" is not correct. There are a couple of smaller ones. Some golfers are wimps nowadays! ;)
As to the OP, I would say Forest Dunes is one of the best Weiskopf courses. [It helps that there aren't many houses; most of his courses are real-estate driven.] Forest Highlands in Arizona is still my personal favorite.
P.S. A lot of the credit for the "Pine Valley" look on part of the back nine should go to the project manager, Tom Fous, who worked on all that while the course was sitting idle through a squabble between the original partners. At least that's what I was told at the time by my friend who was doing marketing for the place.
-
Well being a relatively poor lag putter, the "smallish" greens at the Loop will suit me fine. My last trip to Streamsong led to a lengthy mental health break. >:(
Sounds like Forest Dunes really offers a study in contrasts. The idea of playing an aerial target game on my first 18 followed by a shot-making ground game in the afternoon is pretty darn cool. Just bouncing from bent/blue grass surfaces to tight and firm fescue will require some quick adjusting on the fly.
Pretty excited about it now. If they have a nice bourbon selection and allow cigar smoking on the patio I'll be very happy indeed.
-
I love Forest Dunes, but for me Frost Creek (formerly Adam's Rib) is better. Pretty much a mountain golf ideal.
I would like to see Forest Highlands though. Has anyone played all 3? Forest Dunes, Forest Highlands, Frost Creek?
-
Play Forest Dunes before you play The Loop. I played it after, and had little love for it. Perhaps it was the conditions (soft and spongy) in addition to the claustrobphobia that I felt, among all those trees
-
I think it is a great golf course, possibly the great conditioning made it feel better? The conditions (when I played it) were unreal. I have not played many of his golf courses so I really cannot compare. However, I have played about 95+ courses in the state of Michigan and it is in my top 5 in Michigan for sure. I played it before the Loop was built as well.
-
Weiskopf's original course and the Loop offer a dichotomy that may not exist anywhere else. Loop = fescue, brown, walkable, fast & firm, ground-game. Forest Dunes = green, soft, 'get the yardage and fire away' golf, pretty, and carts. I concur that playing Forest Dunes first is wise advise. Many of my playing partners preferred the Dunes to the Loop; I however, cancelled tee times at Dunes to get a 4th and 5th round in at the Loop. Not much memorable about Weiskopf's course except the fancy impressed concrete 'stone' cart paths and the motorbike carts. Resort was comfortable and enjoyable.
-
How good are the players in your group? One of the interesting debates among the guys from No Laying Up on their recent Michigan trip was what they thought of the Loop, and what was interesting was that the good players didn't enjoy themselves, while the higher handicappers loved it. And that's not because it's easy, but because the way those two types of golfers consume their rounds. The good players didn't like the super firm conditions (and I'd agree when I played it a couple years ago, it was really, really firm, maybe too firm), and pushed up greens on some holes that made scoring near impossible. I had a similar criticism when I played it, that you could not get anywhere near a front pin, because if you tried to bounce one up, you'd hit a hill and die, and if you carried it to the green, you were bouncing to the back if not over the green.
But for the higher handicappers, they saw a place where they were almost certainly not going to lose any golf balls. Higher handicappers may struggle with chips and pitches off of tight lies, but you can putt from everywhere at the Loop, so they weren't chunking chips all day. They could be more creative with shots that were easier to hit, while lower handicappers tend to want to hit certain shots a certain way, and get frustrated when it's hard to do so.
That said, I still think the Loop is really good and it would be a shame to miss it if you're there. We stayed one night so we could play it both ways, and the accommodations were nice. Not super luxurious, but everything we needed. I haven't played the Weiskopf.
-
How good are the players in your group? One of the interesting debates among the guys from No Laying Up on their recent Michigan trip was what they thought of the Loop, and what was interesting was that the good players didn't enjoy themselves, while the higher handicappers loved it. And that's not because it's easy, but because the way those two types of golfers consume their rounds. The good players didn't like the super firm conditions (and I'd agree when I played it a couple years ago, it was really, really firm, maybe too firm), and pushed up greens on some holes that made scoring near impossible. I had a similar criticism when I played it, that you could not get anywhere near a front pin, because if you tried to bounce one up, you'd hit a hill and die, and if you carried it to the green, you were bouncing to the back if not over the green.
But for the higher handicappers, they saw a place where they were almost certainly not going to lose any golf balls. Higher handicappers may struggle with chips and pitches off of tight lies, but you can putt from everywhere at the Loop, so they weren't chunking chips all day. They could be more creative with shots that were easier to hit, while lower handicappers tend to want to hit certain shots a certain way, and get frustrated when it's hard to do so.
The NLU guys’ take on The Loop (forwarded to me by a friend on GCA; I have never spent five minutes on NLU) was somewhere between annoying and hilarious. They thought they would play well their first time around the course, in competition, with no advance prep, and were whiny about it when they got their asses handed to them.
The specific criticism that you can’t get close to a front pin might be true at Red 1 and 6 and 8 and 14 and 15, so maybe twice a round. On the other holes there is plenty of opportunity to land short and run up if you play a lower trajectory shot. If you pound a drive and insist on hitting a high wedge in there, maybe it’s not as easy to get close. It’s gotta suck when an expert golfer can’t hit a shot his mom can. ;)
-
Didn't Weiskopf do Loch Lomond? or did Jay Morrish do most of the work?
-
I look forward to playing The Loop this coming August (I don’t believe the plan is to make time for Forest Dunes but that isn’t nailed down yet).
Making a course sing from two directions is incredibly hard, much harder than most people realise. If Tom and crew have even 90% managed to pull it off with the same panache as their other courses, then that is a huge triumph. I’ve a feeling I’ll like it very much.
-
Didn't Weiskopf do Loch Lomond? or did Jay Morrish do most of the work?
Weiskopf and Morrish did Loch Lomond together (and Forest Highlands, but not Forest Dunes). I don’t think anyone was leaving it out of the discussion trying to parse who did more of it. It’s certainly one of his best courses but I like Forest Highlands more.
One problem for Loch Lomond is the weather. Years ago Walter Woods introduced me to the greenkeeper there and teased him that he was the only guy who could grow grass in the dark! It’s a beautiful spot but not very sunny.
-
How good are the players in your group? One of the interesting debates among the guys from No Laying Up on their recent Michigan trip was what they thought of the Loop, and what was interesting was that the good players didn't enjoy themselves, while the higher handicappers loved it. And that's not because it's easy, but because the way those two types of golfers consume their rounds. The good players didn't like the super firm conditions (and I'd agree when I played it a couple years ago, it was really, really firm, maybe too firm), and pushed up greens on some holes that made scoring near impossible. I had a similar criticism when I played it, that you could not get anywhere near a front pin, because if you tried to bounce one up, you'd hit a hill and die, and if you carried it to the green, you were bouncing to the back if not over the green.
But for the higher handicappers, they saw a place where they were almost certainly not going to lose any golf balls. Higher handicappers may struggle with chips and pitches off of tight lies, but you can putt from everywhere at the Loop, so they weren't chunking chips all day. They could be more creative with shots that were easier to hit, while lower handicappers tend to want to hit certain shots a certain way, and get frustrated when it's hard to do so.
That said, I still think the Loop is really good and it would be a shame to miss it if you're there. We stayed one night so we could play it both ways, and the accommodations were nice. Not super luxurious, but everything we needed. I haven't played the Weiskopf.
I appreciate the insight Bill ... my guys range from +1 to 11 with most between 4 and 8. So, relatively speaking a pretty good group. The premise that the better golfer enjoys fast and firm conditions that requires a ground game less than the higher handicapper is my experience too. True, just about anyone can hit a shot off a tight lie from 40 yards around the green with a putter but that doesn't mean they'll hit it well or the ball will end up close ... higher handicappers just have a lesser expectation and the result will bother them less. Better players are less tolerant of the vagaries that a bouncing or rolling ball are subject too on less than perfect (green-like) surfaces too. It's frustrating to think you've hit a good shot only to have the ground contours dictate otherwise - but sometimes the rub of the green works your way too. Until I play the loop I guess I won't know for sure what I think of the way the greens receive shots - whether through the air or along the ground - but I'm looking forward to it that's for sure.
I'm a sucker for a parkland gem like Forest Dunes seems to be but I really have come to enjoy the creativity that's engendered by the width, firm playing surfaces and large, complex greens at places like Bandon, Streamsong, Sand Valley etc. That's really fun golf if you ask me (notwithstanding the frustration of not being able to throw darts with short irons).
-
Tom
I tend to think the biggest problem the Loch Lomond course has is rainfall. There is a reason why the biggest puddle in Scotland is situated right beside the course ;D
Niall
-
It looks like there are a couple of openings left for the Am Golf Trips better ball event at Forest Dunes in July. Rounds on all three courses, plus a skins game on the Bootlegger. Looking forward to seeing the place for the first time!
-
Tom
I tend to think the biggest problem the Loch Lomond course has is rainfall. There is a reason why the biggest puddle in Scotland is situated right beside the course ;D
Niall
Didn't Loch Lomond spend millions on a new drainage system for the whole course recently?
-
The NLU guys’ take on The Loop (forwarded to me by a friend on GCA; I have never spent five minutes on NLU) was somewhere between annoying and hilarious. They thought they would play well their first time around the course, in competition, with no advance prep, and were whiny about it when they got their asses handed to them.
The specific criticism that you can’t get close to a front pin might be true at Red 1 and 6 and 8 and 14 and 15, so maybe twice a round. On the other holes there is plenty of opportunity to land short and run up if you play a lower trajectory shot. If you pound a drive and insist on hitting a high wedge in there, maybe it’s not as easy to get close. It’s gotta suck when an expert golfer can’t hit a shot his mom can. ;)
They also played there during the Dual, when it was probably turned up a notch or two. I can't remember the exact holes, as it's been a few years, but certainly not every hole had the front pin issue. And I also assumed that the place would soften up a bit over the years such that it may only be a temporary issue. Sounds like it's still pretty firm. Regardless, I think that's a point in the Loop's favor that it takes good players out of their comfort zone while still being an enjoyable experience for higher handicappers.
-
Tom
I tend to think the biggest problem the Loch Lomond course has is rainfall. There is a reason why the biggest puddle in Scotland is situated right beside the course ;D
Niall
Didn't Loch Lomond spend millions on a new drainage system for the whole course recently?
Ben
I don't know what they have done in the last few years but IIRC not long after Lyle Anderson bought it they sand-capped all the fairways and I think rebuilt the greens using the existing contours. Could be wrong about that last bit.
Niall
-
Our very own A Lawrence, Esq.:
https://www.golfcoursearchitecture.net/content/loch-lomond-golf-club-drying-out
-
Better players are less tolerant of the vagaries that a bouncing or rolling ball are subject too on less than perfect (green-like) surfaces too. It's frustrating to think you've hit a good shot only to have the ground contours dictate otherwise - but sometimes the rub of the green works your way too.
One of the most important things I learned from The Old Course was that every little contour around the greens that made it hard to get close to the hole WOULD HAVE BEEN A BACKSTOP IF YOU HAD JUST PLAYED TO THE CORRECT SIDE OF IT.
Sime “good players” just won’t accept that they might have been out of position and that’s their own fault.
-
I've never played Forest Dunes, but Weiskopf's work at the Shenzhou Dunes in China was pretty neat. The property along the water and between the rock outcroppings was probably better than the golf itself, but it was still 2 good enough golf course that it was worthy of the difficult trek across Hainan a couple times.
http://www.shenzhougolf.com.cn/ (http://www.shenzhougolf.com.cn/)
-
I've never played Forest Dunes, but Weiskopf's work at the Shenzhou Dunes in China was pretty neat. The property along the water and between the rock outcroppings was probably better than the golf itself, but it was still 2 good enough golf course that it was worthy of the difficult trek across Hainan a couple times.
http://www.shenzhougolf.com.cn/ (http://www.shenzhougolf.com.cn/)
Thanks Jaeger for jarring my memory. I was going to take a trip to China for golf before covid and this was one my friend said we have to play. Didn't realize it was a Weiskopf until I looked it up and was impressed. Still haven't played, but it is on the list for that China trip.
BTW does anyone know how Tom Weiskopf's health is? I read last year he was battling cancer. Hope he is/has recovered for a real gentlemen.
-
8) Brad,
Think many of the previous comments offer some truth about FD... and put me in the amused camp on the NLU guys.
I've only played 5 Weiskopf courses and have enjoyed them all, with FD definitely my fav so far. I'm biased as we're only 45 min away in summer, its an annual play for the FD course and one of the Loops and I also go out annually to Cedar River which is 20 min away... Maybe one day I'll get out to some of those western eye candy Weiskopf courses which look very inviting...
I'd recommend folks play from the more forward tees at FD, or at least consider it to see what's demanded out of the gate and/or catch the lay of the land for the next play. Certainly helps to be a long hitter, like any course, but there's a lot of control/placement/discipline needed to score well. SO, if ONE IS going to spray it around, beware.
-
How good are the players in your group? One of the interesting debates among the guys from No Laying Up on their recent Michigan trip was what they thought of the Loop, and what was interesting was that the good players didn't enjoy themselves, while the higher handicappers loved it. And that's not because it's easy, but because the way those two types of golfers consume their rounds. The good players didn't like the super firm conditions (and I'd agree when I played it a couple years ago, it was really, really firm, maybe too firm), and pushed up greens on some holes that made scoring near impossible. I had a similar criticism when I played it, that you could not get anywhere near a front pin, because if you tried to bounce one up, you'd hit a hill and die, and if you carried it to the green, you were bouncing to the back if not over the green.
But for the higher handicappers, they saw a place where they were almost certainly not going to lose any golf balls. Higher handicappers may struggle with chips and pitches off of tight lies, but you can putt from everywhere at the Loop, so they weren't chunking chips all day. They could be more creative with shots that were easier to hit, while lower handicappers tend to want to hit certain shots a certain way, and get frustrated when it's hard to do so.
The NLU guys’ take on The Loop (forwarded to me by a friend on GCA; I have never spent five minutes on NLU) was somewhere between annoying and hilarious. They thought they would play well their first time around the course, in competition, with no advance prep, and were whiny about it when they got their asses handed to them.
The specific criticism that you can’t get close to a front pin might be true at Red 1 and 6 and 8 and 14 and 15, so maybe twice a round. On the other holes there is plenty of opportunity to land short and run up if you play a lower trajectory shot. If you pound a drive and insist on hitting a high wedge in there, maybe it’s not as easy to get close. It’s gotta suck when an expert golfer can’t hit a shot his mom can. ;)
I had a similar experience with my playing partner when I played The Loop. I'm a hack so it didn't matter but he's a low handicap player and a long hitter. This was the end of the course's first season and the conditions were very firm. He kept hitting driver which would roll 30 yards into the woods or the waste areas causing much aggravation. But the course is right in front of you with most hazards in plain sight. If he had played smart golf he'd have had a fine round. And the green complexes are among my favorites. The options seem endless.
-
The specific criticism that you can’t get close to a front pin might be true at Red 1 and 6 and 8 and 14 and 15, so maybe twice a round. On the other holes there is plenty of opportunity to land short and run up if you play a lower trajectory shot. If you pound a drive and insist on hitting a high wedge in there, maybe it’s not as easy to get close. It’s gotta suck when an expert golfer can’t hit a shot his mom can. ;)
To Tom's point about moms, I watched my wife hit a low running 6-iron 90 yards onto Red 8, to a front right pin, that went in to the hole for a birdie 3. Take that, "expert golfer". ;D
-
Looking to take a group to Forest Dunes for a couple days and hoping to get some insight into the golf experience there. I've heard the original FD described as having a mix of the pristine and the rustic (PV-like). Generally, I'm a fan of Weiskopf designs and if FD is in fact at the top of his list, I think I'll like it. The Loop is a common discussion item here I know and while I'm certain it will make for a great 18 hole experience, I'm intrigued at just how different the loops will play. Not all of my guys are architecture enthusiasts but they know really good golf when they see it. Would appreciate any comments.
Brad, if you generally like Weiskopf courses, you'll like Forest Dunes. It's underrated as a strategic golf course with a wonderful variety of holes, particularly in the par 4s. Ignore the comments about trees interfering with play and the course being soft. It's built on the same sand as the Loop and drains well, but is definitely a different, more mature surface--it's wall-to-wall bent grass that's been around awhile and won't play as firm and fast as the Loop's newer fescue fairways and newer bent grass greens. Unless you catch it after a bad spate of rainy weather, the Forest Dunes surface will probably suit your group just fine.
Forest Dunes is played more in the air, the Loop more on the ground. They're both excellent golf courses.
-
Weiskopf's original course and the Loop offer a dichotomy that may not exist anywhere else. Loop = fescue, brown, walkable, fast & firm, ground-game. Forest Dunes = green, soft, 'get the yardage and fire away' golf, pretty, and carts. I concur that playing Forest Dunes first is wise advise. Many of my playing partners preferred the Dunes to the Loop; I however, cancelled tee times at Dunes to get a 4th and 5th round in at the Loop. Not much memorable about Weiskopf's course except the fancy impressed concrete 'stone' cart paths and the motorbike carts. Resort was comfortable and enjoyable.
I second all this, especially the "not much memorable" part about the Weiskopf course. It reminded me of Lake Arrowhead which is the course right outside the entrance to Sand Valley in Central WI....good course, lots of trees, nothing special....but Lake Arrowhead was/is a fraction of the cost of FD.
Overall, I think all that the property offers makes it worth a trip, even though the short course wasn't yet built when I was there (it was under construction) and I didn't get to play the Loop both ways because we had to leave the next morning and they had an event. All that said, once was enough for me and I have almost no desire to go back and what little I do is simply to see the Loop on back to back days/both ways but it would be hard to get me to sacrifice a day at Kingsley to make that happen.
-
Jerry Rossi,
Seriously, FD like Lake Arrowhead?? Good course, lots of trees, nothing special??? Maybe my 40 yrs ago memory isn't great on LA, but would never equate it with FD.
LA is certainly cheaper, but have you payed at TKC lately?
-
Jerry Rossi,
Seriously, FD like Lake Arrowhead?? Good course, lots of trees, nothing special??? Maybe my 40 yrs ago memory isn't great on LA, but would never equate it with FD.
LA is certainly cheaper, but have you payed at TKC lately?
What's TKC?
I think LA is a totally fine/average golf course....my thoughts with FD are the same. Half the praise I hear about it are the conditions it was it, which does nothing for me. Not a bad course, just nothing special IMO. The set up there is very cool with the short course, putting green, 2/3 good courses and everything so close together.
-
TKC = The Kingsley Club.
-
TKC = The Kingsley Club.
Thanks Phil.
Steve - yes I have played Kingsley and think it's in another league than FD. Probably my 2nd favorite MI course to Crystal Downs.
-
Well, after much anticipation, we just returned from Roscommon with rounds at FD and the Loop. Since this topic generated some interest when I posted initially, I thought I'd close the loop (ha) with some takeaways.
Forest Dunes - I loved it, as did the group. Could go on with detail but it's a dandy all the way around.
The Loop ... hmmmm ... well, my humble take is that the reversible design is really brilliant. We played counter-clockwise the first day and then clockwise the second day and I think the biggest compliment I could give is that the second day, it didn't feel like I was playing a golf course backward. Frankly, it really did feel like two different golf courses - but with identical playing conditions (obviously). Only one hole struck me as a little awkward playing clockwise. It rained about 2" the 24 hours before we played and it was still impossibly firm and fast. Looks off the tee were great both ways ... with plenty of width. Love that you could find balls in the long grass too when hit off line.
The green contouring was ... brilliant, diabolical and gratuitous. The internal sloping is utterly confusing most of the time and the sloping around the edges is really penal. I still don't know if it was fun or torture. Respectfully, and notwithstanding the architect's comments in an earlier response, I think the combination of heavy sloping, both internal and along edges leading to severe runoffs along with the firmness of the turf pushes past skillful shot making to something where the vagueries and whim of the turf play an outsized role. For every shot I hit where I gauged the bounce, the rollout and the green contours properly and ended up with a ball close to the hole, I hit 5 shots that I thought were good ... that ended up not. This isn't the wounded musing of a good golfer frustrated that he can't throw darts, it just simply feel that the rewards just aren't balanced. Frankly, why would a designer want to neutralize skill ... make it so that a fine result can come from a shot hit by a scratch golfer or his mother? I don't get it. I guess if the Loop was a members course, and people played it regularly, the green contouring would be better understood and the player could use it to their advantage. Whereas, by definition, people playing the Loop are mostly there one time, without time to become familiar.
Anyway, it's brilliant, innovative, controversial and I'd recommend it to anyone in the area. And by the way, why does it sound (and feel) like the golf course is built on a plywood platform? Is it the sandcapping? Couldn't hardly get over the sounds of the golf course.
-
Better players are less tolerant of the vagaries that a bouncing or rolling ball are subject too on less than perfect (green-like) surfaces too. It's frustrating to think you've hit a good shot only to have the ground contours dictate otherwise - but sometimes the rub of the green works your way too.
One of the most important things I learned from The Old Course was that every little contour around the greens that made it hard to get close to the hole WOULD HAVE BEEN A BACKSTOP IF YOU HAD JUST PLAYED TO THE CORRECT SIDE OF IT.
Sime “good players” just won’t accept that they might have been out of position and that’s their own fault.
Similar to TOC, you often don't know you are out of position until after the fact. It would take time to learn the greens and hole locations.
The Loop both ways was about what I expected in terms of playing the courses. I play a lot of hilltop and funky golf so I am well used to the vagaries of the ground game...it takes time to learn the land and the conditions. The more of this style of golf played the more one can draw from experience. The Loop could have been toned down a bit, but in the long run, why? The Loop will find its customers and settle in well.
Ciao
-
Better players are less tolerant of the vagaries that a bouncing or rolling ball are subject too on less than perfect (green-like) surfaces too. It's frustrating to think you've hit a good shot only to have the ground contours dictate otherwise - but sometimes the rub of the green works your way too.
I've always thought of it as a toss of the coin. Can't prove this, but for every 'bad' bounce there must be a good one? It's just that golfers never want to acknowledge the helpful ones?
-
Better players are less tolerant of the vagaries that a bouncing or rolling ball are subject too on less than perfect (green-like) surfaces too. It's frustrating to think you've hit a good shot only to have the ground contours dictate otherwise - but sometimes the rub of the green works your way too.
I've always thought of it as a toss of the coin. Can't prove this, but for every 'bad' bounce there must be a good one? It's just that golfers never want to acknowledge the helpful ones?
My theory is that nearly all "bad bounces" are actually preditcable bounces, but lack of player experience renders these bounces in "the lap of the gods".
Ciao
-
How good are the players in your group? One of the interesting debates among the guys from No Laying Up on their recent Michigan trip was what they thought of the Loop, and what was interesting was that the good players didn't enjoy themselves, while the higher handicappers loved it. And that's not because it's easy, but because the way those two types of golfers consume their rounds. The good players didn't like the super firm conditions (and I'd agree when I played it a couple years ago, it was really, really firm, maybe too firm), and pushed up greens on some holes that made scoring near impossible. I had a similar criticism when I played it, that you could not get anywhere near a front pin, because if you tried to bounce one up, you'd hit a hill and die, and if you carried it to the green, you were bouncing to the back if not over the green.
But for the higher handicappers, they saw a place where they were almost certainly not going to lose any golf balls. Higher handicappers may struggle with chips and pitches off of tight lies, but you can putt from everywhere at the Loop, so they weren't chunking chips all day. They could be more creative with shots that were easier to hit, while lower handicappers tend to want to hit certain shots a certain way, and get frustrated when it's hard to do so.
That said, I still think the Loop is really good and it would be a shame to miss it if you're there. We stayed one night so we could play it both ways, and the accommodations were nice. Not super luxurious, but everything we needed. I haven't played the Weiskopf.
I appreciate the insight Bill ... my guys range from +1 to 11 with most between 4 and 8. So, relatively speaking a pretty good group. The premise that the better golfer enjoys fast and firm conditions that requires a ground game less than the higher handicapper is my experience too. True, just about anyone can hit a shot off a tight lie from 40 yards around the green with a putter but that doesn't mean they'll hit it well or the ball will end up close ... higher handicappers just have a lesser expectation and the result will bother them less. Better players are less tolerant of the vagaries that a bouncing or rolling ball are subject too on less than perfect (green-like) surfaces too. It's frustrating to think you've hit a good shot only to have the ground contours dictate otherwise - but sometimes the rub of the green works your way too. Until I play the loop I guess I won't know for sure what I think of the way the greens receive shots - whether through the air or along the ground - but I'm looking forward to it that's for sure.
I'm a sucker for a parkland gem like Forest Dunes seems to be but I really have come to enjoy the creativity that's engendered by the width, firm playing surfaces and large, complex greens at places like Bandon, Streamsong, Sand Valley etc. That's really fun golf if you ask me (notwithstanding the frustration of not being able to throw darts with short irons).
Lower handicap players get frustrated when they try to play a power game when that's the wrong choice for the course. I played The Loop with a long, low handicap player. It was the end of the first season and the course was very firm. He kept trying to bomb it off the tee and ended up OB or just in the woods when a long iron or 3 wood would have been a smarter play. It a course that requires thoughtful shot making.
-
How good are the players in your group? One of the interesting debates among the guys from No Laying Up on their recent Michigan trip was what they thought of the Loop, and what was interesting was that the good players didn't enjoy themselves, while the higher handicappers loved it. And that's not because it's easy, but because the way those two types of golfers consume their rounds. The good players didn't like the super firm conditions (and I'd agree when I played it a couple years ago, it was really, really firm, maybe too firm), and pushed up greens on some holes that made scoring near impossible. I had a similar criticism when I played it, that you could not get anywhere near a front pin, because if you tried to bounce one up, you'd hit a hill and die, and if you carried it to the green, you were bouncing to the back if not over the green.
But for the higher handicappers, they saw a place where they were almost certainly not going to lose any golf balls. Higher handicappers may struggle with chips and pitches off of tight lies, but you can putt from everywhere at the Loop, so they weren't chunking chips all day. They could be more creative with shots that were easier to hit, while lower handicappers tend to want to hit certain shots a certain way, and get frustrated when it's hard to do so.
That said, I still think the Loop is really good and it would be a shame to miss it if you're there. We stayed one night so we could play it both ways, and the accommodations were nice. Not super luxurious, but everything we needed. I haven't played the Weiskopf.
I appreciate the insight Bill ... my guys range from +1 to 11 with most between 4 and 8. So, relatively speaking a pretty good group. The premise that the better golfer enjoys fast and firm conditions that requires a ground game less than the higher handicapper is my experience too. True, just about anyone can hit a shot off a tight lie from 40 yards around the green with a putter but that doesn't mean they'll hit it well or the ball will end up close ... higher handicappers just have a lesser expectation and the result will bother them less. Better players are less tolerant of the vagaries that a bouncing or rolling ball are subject too on less than perfect (green-like) surfaces too. It's frustrating to think you've hit a good shot only to have the ground contours dictate otherwise - but sometimes the rub of the green works your way too. Until I play the loop I guess I won't know for sure what I think of the way the greens receive shots - whether through the air or along the ground - but I'm looking forward to it that's for sure.
I'm a sucker for a parkland gem like Forest Dunes seems to be but I really have come to enjoy the creativity that's engendered by the width, firm playing surfaces and large, complex greens at places like Bandon, Streamsong, Sand Valley etc. That's really fun golf if you ask me (notwithstanding the frustration of not being able to throw darts with short irons).
Lower handicap players get frustrated when they try to play a power game when that's the wrong choice for the course. I played The Loop with a long, low handicap player. It was the end of the first season and the course was very firm. He kept trying to bomb it off the tee and ended up OB or just in the woods when a long iron or 3 wood would have been a smarter play. It a course that requires thoughtful shot making.
This is a strange discussion and not my experience at all. Maybe you should reframe it as “lower handicappers who have little to no experience of playing true firm and fast conditions don’t like the vagaries of firm and fast conditions”.
Most regular links players would love The Loop, whether they were a +4 or a 24 handicap.
-
8) ... or perhaps reframe it as never underestimate the golfer ego's impact on both play and critical thinking... independent of the gca
ps Forest Dunes' offerings have been fun annual summer play(s)... now what's next for the site???
-
8) ... or perhaps reframe it as never underestimate the golfer ego's impact on both play and critical thinking... independent of the gca
ps Forest Dunes' offerings have been fun annual summer play(s)... now what's next for the site???
I do hope to make a return visit sometime to see the new 18 which should be coming soon I believe?….
The Bootlegger was a bit of fun too…. Robin & I ran round - literally - in 20 minutes during some heavy rain. As we started, a 10-ball was coming off the tenth green. We were thankful for the rain clearing the course.
-
How good are the players in your group? One of the interesting debates among the guys from No Laying Up on their recent Michigan trip was what they thought of the Loop, and what was interesting was that the good players didn't enjoy themselves, while the higher handicappers loved it. And that's not because it's easy, but because the way those two types of golfers consume their rounds. The good players didn't like the super firm conditions (and I'd agree when I played it a couple years ago, it was really, really firm, maybe too firm), and pushed up greens on some holes that made scoring near impossible. I had a similar criticism when I played it, that you could not get anywhere near a front pin, because if you tried to bounce one up, you'd hit a hill and die, and if you carried it to the green, you were bouncing to the back if not over the green.
But for the higher handicappers, they saw a place where they were almost certainly not going to lose any golf balls. Higher handicappers may struggle with chips and pitches off of tight lies, but you can putt from everywhere at the Loop, so they weren't chunking chips all day. They could be more creative with shots that were easier to hit, while lower handicappers tend to want to hit certain shots a certain way, and get frustrated when it's hard to do so.
That said, I still think the Loop is really good and it would be a shame to miss it if you're there. We stayed one night so we could play it both ways, and the accommodations were nice. Not super luxurious, but everything we needed. I haven't played the Weiskopf.
I appreciate the insight Bill ... my guys range from +1 to 11 with most between 4 and 8. So, relatively speaking a pretty good group. The premise that the better golfer enjoys fast and firm conditions that requires a ground game less than the higher handicapper is my experience too. True, just about anyone can hit a shot off a tight lie from 40 yards around the green with a putter but that doesn't mean they'll hit it well or the ball will end up close ... higher handicappers just have a lesser expectation and the result will bother them less. Better players are less tolerant of the vagaries that a bouncing or rolling ball are subject too on less than perfect (green-like) surfaces too. It's frustrating to think you've hit a good shot only to have the ground contours dictate otherwise - but sometimes the rub of the green works your way too. Until I play the loop I guess I won't know for sure what I think of the way the greens receive shots - whether through the air or along the ground - but I'm looking forward to it that's for sure.
I'm a sucker for a parkland gem like Forest Dunes seems to be but I really have come to enjoy the creativity that's engendered by the width, firm playing surfaces and large, complex greens at places like Bandon, Streamsong, Sand Valley etc. That's really fun golf if you ask me (notwithstanding the frustration of not being able to throw darts with short irons).
Lower handicap players get frustrated when they try to play a power game when that's the wrong choice for the course. I played The Loop with a long, low handicap player. It was the end of the first season and the course was very firm. He kept trying to bomb it off the tee and ended up OB or just in the woods when a long iron or 3 wood would have been a smarter play. It a course that requires thoughtful shot making.
This is a strange discussion and not my experience at all. Maybe you should reframe it as “lower handicappers who have little to no experience of playing true firm and fast conditions don’t like the vagaries of firm and fast conditions”.
Most regular links players would love The Loop, whether they were a +4 or a 24 handicap.
The typical golfer in the US has no idea of how to play in firm and fast conditions. It's not handicap dependent. It's grip it and rip it golf.