Golf Club Atlas
GolfClubAtlas.com => Golf Course Architecture => Topic started by: Pete Lavallee on May 15, 2015, 03:49:13 PM
-
http://www.ncga.org/2015/05/14/a-wider-but-also-familiar-17th-green-coming-to-pebble-beach-golf-links/
-
I am for it. The green was way too small for the shot required.
-
Says they are going to sod it. Sod it with what?
The other thing missing is did they build it to USGA spec and install sub air?
-
The article states that 10 greens have already been redone. I recall Tom Doak saying they are all rebuilt to USGA specs. I doubt they need sub air.
-
Having observed the degradation of the putting surface over the last 40-odd years, I am all for it. The buildup of sand over the years made it ridiculous and nearly impossible.
It is one thing to have a Riviera type idea with a bunker in the middle of the green provided there is an option to use the contours of the putting surface to get from one part of the green to the other.
However, watching Miguel Jimenez have to flop a sand wedge off the putting surface is just silly. It is about time everybody stopped pretending the 17th hole was mis-designed like that because it is not true.
-
I hope they get it right!
-
I hope they get it right!
Me too. Ryan Farrow posted an old picture of it I'd never seen on twitter back during the pro am. It was pretty cool looking--lots of visibility/size, and some good contour between the two sections. Doesn't seem like that level of contour has been achieved in that photo in the article, but it can be hard to tell, especially in muted light.
-
I hope they get it right!
Me too. Ryan Farrow posted an old picture of it I'd never seen on twitter back during the pro am. It was pretty cool looking--lots of visibility/size, and some good contour between the two sections. Doesn't seem like that level of contour has been achieved in that photo in the article, but it can be hard to tell, especially in muted light.
Of course they got it right, they had Arnold Palmer overseeing the project and to make it perfect they did the work in house. What could go wrong?
(http://assets.graniterockcdn.com/production/397befcd-314d-46af-9b14-1ac8e27ccbfd.jpg)
-
I hope they get it right!
Me too. Ryan Farrow posted an old picture of it I'd never seen on twitter back during the pro am. It was pretty cool looking--lots of visibility/size, and some good contour between the two sections. Doesn't seem like that level of contour has been achieved in that photo in the article, but it can be hard to tell, especially in muted light.
Of course they got it right, they had Arnold Palmer overseeing the project and to make it perfect they did the work in house. What could go wrong?
(http://assets.graniterockcdn.com/production/397befcd-314d-46af-9b14-1ac8e27ccbfd.jpg)
Gary,
They are working on 17, not 7 as seen in you photo
-
Yes I know. I was trying to have fun when 7 was torn up.
Here is 17, from the PB web site.
(http://media.pebblebeach.com/images/stories/headers/17th-Hole_PBGL_Schiller.jpg)
-
That is WAY better than what they've had. Kudos to Arnie, or to whoever did the work.
-
Yes I know. I was trying to have fun when 7 was torn up.
Here is 17, from the PB web site.
(http://media.pebblebeach.com/images/stories/headers/17th-Hole_PBGL_Schiller.jpg)
Is it the 10 year anniversary thread talking, or does that front left bunker from the angle of this picture look a hell of a lot like a rabbit?
-
Does anyone have before and after pics?
-
Carl -
Here are a number of images (some real and some imagined). If you scroll down there is a "before" pic, but not with much of an aerial view.
http://www.geoffshackelford.com/homepage/2010/6/28/pebbles-17th-another-look-at-the-evolution.html
DT
P.S. Here is a better pic:
http://www.caddybytes.com/Pebble_Beach_17th_hole_picture.htm.htm
-
Yes I know. I was trying to have fun when 7 was torn up.
Here is 17, from the PB web site.
(http://media.pebblebeach.com/images/stories/headers/17th-Hole_PBGL_Schiller.jpg)
Is it the 10 year anniversary thread talking, or does that front left bunker from the angle of this picture look a hell of a lot like a rabbit?
And a white rabbit to boot ;D
-
Some more pictures of #17:
http://www.geoffshackelford.com/homepage/2015/5/17/some-pebble-beach-17th-photos-under-construction.html
-
A couple more photos from this thread in early May:
http://www.golfclubatlas.com/forum/index.php/topic,60959.0.html (http://www.golfclubatlas.com/forum/index.php/topic,60959.0.html)
-
Geoff Shack posted some grow in photos, as Howard notes above. Does the bunker shape seem better in dirt and at ground level than from the air? If so, great, but the aerial above doesn't look like the exact same bunker shape to me as what existed before the sod.
Any explanations?
In either case, I think Palmer did an excellent job doing what needed to be done. Of course, I liked their revamped bunkers in the last Open there. I thought the old ones were tired, and their new ones were traditional enough to fit in, but with enough extra shape to be a nice improvement.
-
I was just out there and played Pebble and saw the construction work. The caddie I had has been sending me photos including early on in the construction. Yes they put in a sub air system and apparently built to USGA spec. The bunkers look great from ground level (nothing like a rabbit). The sod came from in front of Bing's house. They must have been preparing for this there. Looks to me like they did a great job with the hole. Of course there will be no more trying to replicate Tom Watson's chip in! There is a bunker there now!
-
I was just out there and played Pebble and saw the construction work. The caddie I had has been sending me photos including early on in the construction. Yes they put in a sub air system and apparently built to USGA spec. The bunkers look great from ground level (nothing like a rabbit). The sod came from in front of Bing's house. They must have been preparing for this there. Looks to me like they did a great job with the hole. Of course there will be no more trying to replicate Tom Watson's chip in! There is a bunker there now!
I believe that the area where Watson chipped in from was washed away in a storm years ago. That's what I was told by my caddie when I played there a few years ago anyway.
-
Yes they put in a sub air system and apparently built to USGA spec.
Mark, any idea if the sub air installation is part of Palmers grand plan to change the grass to bent? If I remember correctly, Palmer told the GD panelists in Orlando that he wanted to change the grass. It was all speculation but Palmer and the Pebble Beach Company are still horrified at Tigers comments about the bumpy greens and his refusal to return to the AT&T.
-
Growing up and still living in upstate NY, most of the greens I play on have a lot of Poa. I've never understood the whining from the Pros about it. It may get a little bumpy very late in the day but under normal conditions it putts just fine.
-
Joel,
Many years ago they changed the #2 green to bent and it didn't go too well. I don't know what their future plans are at this point?
Mark
-
"I've never understood the whining from the Pros about it. It may get a little bumpy very late in the day but under normal conditions it putts just fine."
Rob M. -
Part of the whining from the Pros about the greens during the AT&T/Crosby is that the pin placements remain the same on all three courses for the first 3 days of the tournament. As a result, there is a lot of accumulated foot traffic around the cups by the 3rd day of the tournament. Not exactly "normal conditions!"
Plus that event is played in February, when the greens are usually soft due to the winter rains (at least back when it used to rain in California during the winter. ;))
DT
-
"I've never understood the whining from the Pros about it. It may get a little bumpy very late in the day but under normal conditions it putts just fine."
Rob M. -
Part of the whining from the Pros about the greens during the AT&T/Crosby is that the pin placements remain the same on all three courses for the first 3 days of the tournament. As a result, there is a lot of accumulated foot traffic around the cups by the 3rd day of the tournament. Not exactly "normal conditions!"
Plus that event is played in February, when the greens are usually soft due to the winter rains (at least back when it used to rain in California during the winter. ;))
DT
So is it the Poa or the foot traffic or a combination of both?
-
"So is it the Poa or the foot traffic or a combination of both?"
Rob M. -
At the AT&T it is a combination of both, plus the usual February weather. Also remember that play in the AT&T is 4-balls, with 2 pros and 2 amateurs (plus 4 caddies) in each group. In addition, I think there are close to 160 teams that play in the AT&T. That is a lot of foot traffic on those small greens at Pebble.
There are far fewer comments about bumpy poa greens at Pebble when the US Open is played there in June.
DT
-
"So is it the Poa or the foot traffic or a combination of both?"
Rob M. -
At the AT&T it is a combination of both, plus the usual February weather. Also remember that play in the AT&T is 4-balls, with 2 pros and 2 amateurs (plus 4 caddies) in each group. In addition, I think there are close to 160 teams that play in the AT&T. That is a lot of foot traffic on those small greens at Pebble.
There are far fewer comments about bumpy poa greens at Pebble when the US Open is played there in June.
DT
With the leaders obviously playing the latest rounds of the day on Sunday . . . .
-
"With the leaders obviously playing the latest rounds of the day on Sunday"
Carl N. -
At least on Sunday the final round is played with new pin positions, whereas the pins are not moved during the first 3 days.
DT
-
"With the leaders obviously playing the latest rounds of the day on Sunday"
Carl N. -
At least on Sunday the final round is played with new pin positions, whereas the pins are not moved during the first 3 days.
DT
David:
Understood. But the cumulative effect of extra amateur play (albeit not the full field) and the growth of the poa is felt most by the final groups.
-
In fairness, the conditions at Pebble have improved dramatically in the last 10 years, and I believe
there is less talk about the greens.
I played Pebble a few weeks ago and could not believe how good the conditions were.
Back in the late 90's, the conditions of all the courses were usually pretty bad. Soft, wet, bumpy.
It definitely took some toughness (which I struggled with :D) to deal with standing over some putts
knowing you can't make it!
Back then, Riviera was even worse. I had a putt on 18 at Riviera from 4 feet very late Friday with a 2 shot
cushion to make the cut. I actually lagged it. The green was so foot printed up there was know way if I missed it by more than
a foot I believed I could make the next one!
Riviera is another course that in the past years has improved the conditions dramatically. Those greens were beautiful the days aftert he tournament the past couple years!
-
The conditions at Pebble including the greens have improved dramatically over the years. The greens were near perfect (despite all the play it gets from all kinds of golfers) when I played it a week or so ago. Most of the great golf courses in the Northeast of the U.S. have a mix of bent and poa and most U.S. Opens (I would bet 3/4 or more) have been played on greens with some poa in them!
-
More pics:
http://www.geoffshackelford.com/homepage/2015/5/24/photos-17th-at-pebble-beach-update.html