News:

This discussion group is best enjoyed using Google Chrome, Firefox or Safari.


Peter Pallotta

Re: Sand Valley 3 "will be just over 6,000 yards and par will be 67 or 68"
« Reply #125 on: September 10, 2018, 07:07:06 PM »
How about telling him: Peter P says you're dangerously close to drinking your own Kool-aid, so please listen to your architect on this one, will you? I mean, there's no shame in not *always* being a genius, eh? Look, even the 'Rocky' films pretty much died with #s 4 and 5, until Stallone finally had the good sense to get out of the way and let someone else make 'Creed'. And plus, this canary in the coalmine is here to say: the world is changing. I don't think even Joe Passov let alone Matty G are gonna wax poetic about one more set of 100 yard wide fairways, huge greens, and lots of sand, are they? And if they don't, it'll be because you'd undercut/diminished  an important new 'design' by insisting on your tired tried and true 'concept'.

Do you think that might help? Me, to be honest, am not so sure...
« Last Edit: September 10, 2018, 08:36:53 PM by Peter Pallotta »

Carl Rogers

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Sand Valley 3 "will be just over 6,000 yards and par will be 67 or 68"
« Reply #126 on: September 10, 2018, 08:30:41 PM »
Distance wise, this course will be no push over for the golfer whose drives carries ......... let's say 210.  [/size]Is the assumption that the through the green will permit a lot of roll out?  So it might play shorter?  But then, if the lies are tight and there are forced carries over deep bunkers, then the short hitter will have it rough.
I decline to accept the end of man. ... William Faulkner

David_Tepper

  • Karma: +0/-0

PCCraig

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Sand Valley 3 "will be just over 6,000 yards and par will be 67 or 68"
« Reply #128 on: October 22, 2018, 02:36:08 PM »
I'm pretty tired of the Kidd vs. Doak angle.
H.P.S.

Peter Pallotta

Re: Sand Valley 3 "will be just over 6,000 yards and par will be 67 or 68"
« Reply #129 on: October 22, 2018, 03:22:29 PM »
P - I know what you mean, but fortunately both are doing well enough, so 'no harm, no foul' I suppose. For me it's always about the writing: Eamon Lynch is a good writer and I like his work; but I don't like when folks stretch too far for the sake of a narrative, in this case 'Tom as iconoclast'. It may well be true, but I don't think (as Eamon suggests in support) that "purists blanche" at either the 4 Par 3s on PD's back nine or at the reversibility of The Loop. Heck, if that's what qualifies as being a purist, Mike Davis and the USGA set-up men must be the only purists left!
P

Tom_Doak

  • Karma: +1/-1
Re: Sand Valley 3 "will be just over 6,000 yards and par will be 67 or 68"
« Reply #130 on: October 22, 2018, 07:47:09 PM »
I'm pretty tired of the Kidd vs. Doak angle.


#Me too


But there's nothing else to write about until we actually start building something.

Steve Lang

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Sand Valley 3 "will be just over 6,000 yards and par will be 67 or 68"
« Reply #131 on: October 22, 2018, 08:15:12 PM »
 8)  TD,
Are you going to have less than or more than 6 sets of tees?  Are you going to tickle a slope of 140?
Inverness (Toledo, OH) cathedral clock inscription: "God measures men by what they are. Not what they in wealth possess.  That vibrant message chimes afar.
The voice of Inverness"

Tom_Doak

  • Karma: +1/-1
Re: Sand Valley 3 "will be just over 6,000 yards and par will be 67 or 68"
« Reply #132 on: October 22, 2018, 09:44:14 PM »
8)  TD,
Are you going to have less than or more than 6 sets of tees?  Are you going to tickle a slope of 140?


They'd fire me before I got it to 140! 😉


If I could build two sets of tees I would.  But I'd guess we will wind up with four (ugh) or three.

Ira Fishman

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Sand Valley 3 "will be just over 6,000 yards and par will be 67 or 68"
« Reply #133 on: October 23, 2018, 08:43:51 AM »
As I note above, I am not a Tom Doak acolyte, but I do give him credit for having the Kahonas to state explicitly he is trying to build a Swinley Forest which I thought a truly marvelous course on all levels (or Rye which I have not played).  It always has been clear that Tom does not lack for confidence, but to be willing to offer up a comparison to great Colt Classics that have stood the test of time does--to repeat--take big Kahonas.


Ira

George Myers

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Sand Valley 3 "will be just over 6,000 yards and par will be 67 or 68"
« Reply #134 on: October 23, 2018, 01:27:15 PM »
sorry, but I must clarify.


The word is "cojones"


To add some relevant comment: New Zealand would be another course which fulfills the "par below 70 and distance roundabout 6000 yds, correct?
« Last Edit: October 23, 2018, 01:35:54 PM by George Myers »

Ira Fishman

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Sand Valley 3 "will be just over 6,000 yards and par will be 67 or 68"
« Reply #135 on: October 23, 2018, 01:51:05 PM »
George, I stand corrected.  I did use the bastardized English version. 


Ira

Peter Pallotta

Re: Sand Valley 3 "will be just over 6,000 yards and par will be 67 or 68"
« Reply #136 on: October 23, 2018, 02:11:34 PM »
George, I stand corrected.  I did use the bastardized English version. 
Ira
I assumed it was the laid-back Southern California version - and I thought: 'Hmm, that's strange: Ira always struck me as a quintessentially northeastern type, Boston or New York'. Next thing I know you'll be telling me that Torrey Pines and the Arizona desert courses are your favourites!
P

JMEvensky

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Sand Valley 3 "will be just over 6,000 yards and par will be 67 or 68"
« Reply #137 on: October 23, 2018, 02:43:13 PM »
George, I stand corrected.  I did use the bastardized English version. 
Ira
I assumed it was the laid-back Southern California version - and I thought: 'Hmm, that's strange: Ira always struck me as a quintessentially northeastern type, Boston or New York'. Next thing I know you'll be telling me that Torrey Pines and the Arizona desert courses are your favourites!
P



I thought it was some Hawaiian Yiddish variant.

Ira Fishman

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Sand Valley 3 "will be just over 6,000 yards and par will be 67 or 68"
« Reply #138 on: October 23, 2018, 02:51:24 PM »
George, I stand corrected.  I did use the bastardized English version. 
Ira
I assumed it was the laid-back Southern California version - and I thought: 'Hmm, that's strange: Ira always struck me as a quintessentially northeastern type, Boston or New York'. Next thing I know you'll be telling me that Torrey Pines and the Arizona desert courses are your favourites!
P



I thought it was some Hawaiian Yiddish variant.


LOL...twice. 


Ira

Peter Pallotta

Re: Sand Valley 3 "will be just over 6,000 yards and par will be 67 or 68"
« Reply #139 on: October 23, 2018, 02:54:39 PM »
 :)
But he loves courses like Deal, and there's hardly an Hawaiian to be found there...
P

Kalen Braley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Sand Valley 3 "will be just over 6,000 yards and par will be 67 or 68"
« Reply #140 on: October 23, 2018, 03:08:07 PM »
I'm just surprised anyone thinks Tom is still in the proving himself business...

If you don't think he knows what's he doing by now, then i'm not sure what would convince....
« Last Edit: October 23, 2018, 06:36:51 PM by Kalen Braley »

Tom_Doak

  • Karma: +1/-1
Re: Sand Valley 3 "will be just over 6,000 yards and par will be 67 or 68"
« Reply #141 on: October 23, 2018, 09:42:34 PM »
sorry, but I must clarify.


The word is "cojones"


To add some relevant comment: New Zealand would be another course which fulfills the "par below 70 and distance roundabout 6000 yds, correct?


Yes, New Zealand would be another comparable course.  I never think to mention it because I've never actually played it, I saw it just once, in 1982!


Arrowtown, in New Zealand, would be another, but I doubt we will go bunkerless like that one.

Tom_Doak

  • Karma: +1/-1
Re: Sand Valley 3 "will be just over 6,000 yards and par will be 67 or 68"
« Reply #142 on: October 23, 2018, 09:46:59 PM »
As I note above, I am not a Tom Doak acolyte, but I do give him credit for having the Kahonas to state explicitly he is trying to build a Swinley Forest which I thought a truly marvelous course on all levels (or Rye which I have not played).  It always has been clear that Tom does not lack for confidence, but to be willing to offer up a comparison to great Colt Classics that have stood the test of time does--to repeat--take big Kahonas.



Ira:


I don't agree here.  It takes some guts to say you're going to build a 6100-yard course and put up with all the naysayers, but honestly very few Americans have any idea of Swinley Forest or Rye, so they can't really call me on it.  Had I compared it to Cypress Point, yes, that would be asking for trouble.


However, after having built one course between Muirfield and North Berwick, and another next to National and Shinnecock, all other comparisons seem relatively tame to me.   ;)

Daryl David

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Sand Valley 3 "will be just over 6,000 yards and par will be 67 or 68"
« Reply #143 on: October 23, 2018, 10:17:50 PM »
sorry, but I must clarify.


The word is "cojones"


To add some relevant comment: New Zealand would be another course which fulfills the "par below 70 and distance roundabout 6000 yds, correct?


Yes, New Zealand would be another comparable course.  I never think to mention it because I've never actually played it, I saw it just once, in 1982!


Arrowtown, in New Zealand, would be another, but I doubt we will go bunkerless like that one.


I can’t wait for this project. Anything that is the likes of New Zealand, Rye, Swinley and Arrowtown could have me relocating to Wisconsin...at least for summers.

Ira Fishman

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Sand Valley 3 "will be just over 6,000 yards and par will be 67 or 68"
« Reply #144 on: October 24, 2018, 07:45:26 AM »
As I note above, I am not a Tom Doak acolyte, but I do give him credit for having the Kahonas to state explicitly he is trying to build a Swinley Forest which I thought a truly marvelous course on all levels (or Rye which I have not played).  It always has been clear that Tom does not lack for confidence, but to be willing to offer up a comparison to great Colt Classics that have stood the test of time does--to repeat--take big Kahonas.



Ira:


I don't agree here.  It takes some guts to say you're going to build a 6100-yard course and put up with all the naysayers, but honestly very few Americans have any idea of Swinley Forest or Rye, so they can't really call me on it.  Had I compared it to Cypress Point, yes, that would be asking for trouble.


However, after having built one course between Muirfield and North Berwick, and another next to National and Shinnecock, all other comparisons seem relatively tame to me.   ;)


Tom, more than a fair point.  With one caveat.  Getting access to Swinley Forest, Rye, and Sand Valley is straightforward so doing comparisons possible.  The odds for most of us to play any of NGLA, Shinnecock, or Sebonack, let alone all three, are pretty low.


I have been fortunate enough to play both Cypress Point and Swinley Forest.  I would play either any day of the week and twice on every day of the week.  My cajones comment stands.


Ira

Adam Lawrence

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Sand Valley 3 "will be just over 6,000 yards and par will be 67 or 68"
« Reply #145 on: October 24, 2018, 08:40:36 AM »
Comment may still stand, but you still can't spell 'cojones'  :D
Adam Lawrence

Editor, Golf Course Architecture
www.golfcoursearchitecture.net

Principal, Oxford Golf Consulting
www.oxfordgolfconsulting.com

Author, 'More Enduring Than Brass: a biography of Harry Colt' (forthcoming).

Short words are best, and the old words, when short, are the best of all.

Ira Fishman

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Sand Valley 3 "will be just over 6,000 yards and par will be 67 or 68"
« Reply #146 on: October 24, 2018, 08:46:15 AM »
Comment may still stand, but you still can't spell 'cojones'  :D


I had a feeling I had it wrong when I hit Post.  Just do not tell my kids--I am on their cases all of the time about grammar and spelling.


Ira

George Myers

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Sand Valley 3 "will be just over 6,000 yards and par will be 67 or 68"
« Reply #147 on: October 24, 2018, 09:30:42 AM »
All good, Ira.


Thanks for the chuckle.


The spanish speaker in me can't help to point out the irony that cajones is the word for canyons.




Ira Fishman

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Sand Valley 3 "will be just over 6,000 yards and par will be 67 or 68"
« Reply #148 on: October 24, 2018, 09:36:04 AM »
All good, Ira.


Thanks for the chuckle.


The spanish speaker in me can't help to point out the irony that cajones is the word for canyons.


George, thanks and cannot wait to share this one with my sister who is fluent in Spanish.  I barely scrape by with English.


Ira

George Myers

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Sand Valley 3 "will be just over 6,000 yards and par will be 67 or 68"
« Reply #149 on: October 24, 2018, 09:38:57 AM »
sorry, but I must clarify.


The word is "cojones"


To add some relevant comment: New Zealand would be another course which fulfills the "par below 70 and distance roundabout 6000 yds, correct?


Yes, New Zealand would be another comparable course.  I never think to mention it because I've never actually played it, I saw it just once, in 1982!


Arrowtown, in New Zealand, would be another, but I doubt we will go bunkerless like that one.


To be honest, I haven't seen it myself, but have read about it here (and in Confidential Guide Vol 1), and thought to mention it. So thanks are in order to the group!


I hope to go play the heathland courses at some point in the future.


Hoping that that a work trip might take me there (we have an office in Surrey).


Tags:
Tags:

An Error Has Occurred!

Call to undefined function theme_linktree()
Back