[Mac Plumart]

My friend says they are over-rated.  I like'em.

Discuss.

Anthony

 

[Mark Saltzman]

Most bunkers are too well-manicured and shallow and thus provide a respite from a potential bad lie in rough. They are too easy for the skilled player.

Other bunkers are too deep and penal and the average golfer cannot get out of it and simply results in the player picking up.

Ergo, bunkers, all bunkers, are bad.  

[JESII]

People may speculate that they've been neutered by expected maintenance practices but they still dictate planning when you encounter one...that said, throw away the rakes, expect people to smooth their footprints some and get after it...

[Anthony Gray]

  I think they make great decoration. Great discussion.

  Anthony

[Randy Thompson]

Were meant to be hazards but TV has contaminated Average member Joe´s brain and therefore he bitches like hell if he doesn´t have a perfect TV lie and perfect consistent - dry sand throughout his golfing experience. Heavens to forbid, if Joe gets a fried egg from local sand. Club will increase dues and import sand from 300 miles to correct that problem. We need to get back to the basics, use whatever sand is readily avaiable and a greenchairmen with the balls to answer to the crying membership, "It´s a freaking hazard, what did you expect"? Amen!

[Matt Ingraham]

I won't complain as long as there is at least a little sand in the bunker.  Last summer while at Bandon my friend and I were both in the bunker left of the green on the 13th at Trails.  There wasn't a grain of sand around our balls; it was bare hard pan.  A tough shot with sand became impossible. 

Just my .02         

[Sean_A]

Bunkers are great in both creating visual interest and playing options/demands.  But, bunkering is far over-used at the cost of many other cool features which do the same thing,  At best this approach is misguided, at worst it is lazy architecture.  Archies should be looking for ways to place one or two knockout bunkers instead of seas of sand.  Its more efficient design and often times more thought provoking.  I can live in hope.  

Mac - proper bunkers.  Unlike the 100 a course style, this bunker cannot be ignored.




Bunkers can also tandem well with what was given to the archie.  Its simple, elegant and above all thinking man's golf.



Ciao

[Brett_Morrissy]

Bunkers are great in both creating visual interest and playing options/demands.  
But, bunkering is far over-used at the cost of many other cool features which do the same thing,

Sean,
Completely agree with your first sentence, it is not just about what is in the bunker, as that should not be any golfers aim( apart from the ridiculous situation of a PGA Tour Player yelling "get in the bunker"), to hit their shot into a bunker.  For me, a bunker first and foremost prerequisite is on the tee or fairway, preparing to hit your shot, to make the golfer question himself, his shot choice, and provide some doubt and some challenge in getting himself into the best possible position to make his next shot. The condition, look and style, should always be secondary to the initial function asked on the tee, or on the approach, etc

To your second sentence, I am sure that many courses are over bunkered, and over water hazard-ed for that matter, add over watered as well! - what I would like like to see you expand on is the "many other cool features which do the same thing" - can you give some examples of this Sean, in particular, cool features that are clear and obvious from the tee or approach shot, can assume you are not referring to hidden fairway wee burns and the like.
Cheers

[Brett_Morrissy]

Mac, I love them.
I understand the notion of minimal bunkers, but I really do like a well positioned, well shaped bunker, it will always have beautiful scale, and jus took as though it was meant to be there.

[Chris Buie]

For what it's worth, here are a couple of antiquarian takes on the subject:

"Bunkers, if they be good bunkers, and bunkers of strong character, refuse to be disregarded, and insist on asserting themselves; they do not mind being avoided, but they decline to be ignored" - John Low Concerning Golf - 1903

Tillinghast was good enough to give us his viewpoint in his essay "Sans Sand Pits".

"An inspection of the ground, rolling country dotted with bunches of mesquite and ouisache scrub growth, revealed the fact that judicious use of natural contours of terrain and encroachments of native growths could produce a truly interesting course."

http://www.la84foundation.org/SportsLibrary/AmericanGolfer/1933/ag364o.pdf

[Sean_A]

Bunkers are great in both creating visual interest and playing options/demands.  
But, bunkering is far over-used at the cost of many other cool features which do the same thing,

Sean,
Completely agree with your first sentence, it is not just about what is in the bunker, as that should not be any golfers aim( apart from the ridiculous situation of a PGA Tour Player yelling "get in the bunker"), to hit their shot into a bunker.  For me, a bunker first and foremost prerequisite is on the tee or fairway, preparing to hit your shot, to make the golfer question himself, his shot choice, and provide some doubt and some challenge in getting himself into the best possible position to make his next shot. The condition, look and style, should always be secondary to the initial function asked on the tee, or on the approach, etc

To your second sentence, I am sure that many courses are over bunkered, and over water hazard-ed for that matter, add over watered as well! - what I would like like to see you expand on is the "many other cool features which do the same thing" - can you give some examples of this Sean, in particular, cool features that are clear and obvious from the tee or approach shot, can assume you are not referring to hidden fairway wee burns and the like.
Cheers

Brent

A ditch running the length of the fairway and in the fairway - very unusual.


A small hill cutting off the low cut tee shot - quite a cool way to require a shot type.


Set the tee at an awkward angle to the fairway - very simple oh so rare.






Dead ground - classic tactic! But I admit it requires a less than full view of the field ahead.  But then, I never said a cool feature couldn't be blind.


Just squeeze the landing zone with a less than ideal lie/angle.


Squeeze the area ahead of the landing zone to make the golfer gain the correct side of the fairway to take advantage of wind.


A ditch - good stuff.




Slide the green around a corner making the outside of the leg the place to be - of course rough or whatever can guard that side.  


How bout mounding?




Natural vegetation.




Just end the fairway.




Use the natural terrain well.


How bout hollows?




I don't know what this is called.


I think you get the idea.

Ciao

[Mac Plumart]

Indeed, I get the idea.  Great stuff!!

Thanks for starting this thread Anthony.

 

[Jud_T]

this is a bunker:

[Brett_Morrissy]

Sean, a superb collection of pics, thanks for posting them.

When you referred to over us of a bunker, that seems to mostly occur on crap land, sometimes devoid of decent natural features. I had no idea you were going to put up all that spectacular ground, I did think you might put up those drainage trenches from Swinley Forest....?

My favourite from those would be the scratchy, rough ground that squeezes the fairway, looks like it is 'mowed' by the local sheep or goats, find you ball, half shot penalty from rough ground, interesting and always unique and by their by nature must fit the ground and ties in beautifully.

Thanks.

[Anthony Gray]

Indeed, I get the idea.  Great stuff!!

Thanks for starting this thread Anthony.

 

  Thanks Mac. I think its some of my best work. I'm working on a new fish bar thread that will go at least 3 pages. my goal is 4 new threads a week until the 5th major. I hope Kentucky wins the NCAA.

  Anthony

[Bill_McBride]

Great tour de force, Sean.  I know there are some very good courses in that bunch Mac posted to start this thread, but the use of limited but very high impact bunkers and all the other hazards at New Zealand and Huntercombe really make me want to revisit those fine courses.   And I'd really like to see Berkhamstead some day!

[Anthony Gray]

  How deep is too deep?

  Should this be a new thread?

   Mac

[Chris Buie]

[Melvyn Morrow]

Anthony

How deep is too deep?

Simple too deep is when you get an echo otherwise no problem don't worry. Or The Road Hole Bunker is shallowish and should not defined as deep, ditto Hell Bunker.

Melvyn

[Anthony Gray]

  I've always wondered if any of that sand was natural.

 

[Sean_A]

What a wasted opportunity to come up something very cool.  The second pic is practically the very definition of archie overkill - what a shame.


Ace

When you are coming over you know I am your man for reasonably priced golf on out of the box courses.  Give me a shout.

Ciao

[Anthony Gray]

this is a bunker:

  Is this Old Mac?

[Jud_T]

yup.  #10.

[Bill_McBride]

What a wasted opportunity to come up something very cool.  The second pic is practically the very definition of archie overkill - what a shame.


Ace

When you are coming over you know I am your man for reasonably priced golf on out of the box courses.  Give me a shout.

Ciao

Without a doubt!

[Kalen Braley]

Sean,

What a fantastic post that was for #10.

I take back everything I said in the Bandon vs UK thread....where do I sign up to come over and play that kind of awesome stuff!! 

[Tags:]

Tags:

[Tags:]

Tags:

Call to undefined function theme_linktree()